Holmes' conclusions at Buck vs. Bell, Paul Lombardo
Description:
Interviewee: Paul Lombardo.
In the Supreme Court decision, Justice Holmes compared sterilization for feeblemindedness to a vaccination for smallpox.
(DNAi Location: Chronicle > Trial of Carrie Buck > Epilogue > A false analogy)
Transcript:
Justice Holmes' opinion in the Buck case concluded that there was little difference between a vaccination for smallpox and an operation to interrupt someone's reproductive potential. In fact this was a false analogy: the vaccination case upon which his notion rested, only fined a man five dollars who refused to be vaccinated.
Keywords:
oliver wendell holmes,carrie buck,false analogy,supreme court decision,justice holmes,dnai,interviewee,lombardo,five dollars,sterilization,vaccination,smallpox,epilogue,conclusions,notion
Paul Lombardo talks about justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' Supreme Court decisions contained a number of memorable phrases, and Buck vs. Bell provided him an opportunity to create another.
Paul Lombardo talks about the case conluded that Carrie, Emma, and Vivian represented three generations of imbeciles, which justified Carrie's sterilization.
Paul Lombardo talks about Carrie's lawyer, Irving Whitehead, colluded with lawyers representing the Virginia Colony to help insure that the case went to the Supreme Court.