Website Search
ID 15021

The moratorium letter regarding risky experiments, Paul Berg

Interviewee: Paul Berg. In 1974, scientists in the field of recombinant DNA drafted a letter calling upon "scientists throughout the world" to suspend certain types of studies until hazards could be assessed. Paul Berg talks about the "Moratorium Letter." (DNAi Location: Manipulation > Revolution > Players > The controversy > The moratorium letter)
And as the letter developed, what we realized is not every conceivable experiment was dangerous, or could anybody even claim to be dangerous, although certain types of experiments might be. So the letter was constructed, although it's been referred to as a moratorium, we didn't ask for any cessation of the experiments, the letter actually identified a wide variety of experiments that we believed could proceed without any risk. And then identified three kinds of experiments that we thought carried some degree of risk, even though we didn't know the extent of that. And therefore we suggested that people would defer those three kinds of experiments, don't put toxin genes into E. coli, don't put drug-resistant genes into E. coli and don't put cancer genes into E. coli.
cancer genes,recombinant dna,paul berg,degree of risk,dnai,e coli,moratorium,interviewee,cessation,toxin,manipulation,controversy,scientists,extent
Creative Commons License This work by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Related content:

15020. Possible dangers of recombinant DNA, Paul Berg
Paul Berg talks about possible dangers of recombinant DNA.
15023. The experiment that galvanized the scientific community, Paul Berg
Paul Berg talks about why experiments with recombinant DNA set off a firestorm of controversy, including a moratorium on further experimentation with rDNA.
15024. The origin and utility of recombinant DNA, Paul Berg
Paul Berg discusses the usefulness of recombinant DNA to isolate and study genes.
15018. Outrage over recombinant DNA, Paul Berg
Paul Berg's student, Janet Mertz, planned an experiment that would recombine DNA from a monkey virus with DNA from a bacterium that lives in the human gut. Berg describes colleague Bob Pollack's outrage at this.
15017. Reaction to outrage over recombinant DNA, Paul Berg
Paul Berg recollects his reaction to his colleague Bob Pollack's opposition to experimentation with recombinant DNA.
15022. How the first recombinant DNA was created, Paul Berg
Paul Berg speaks about his student Janet Mertz's experiment to make the first recombinant DNA molecule.
15025. On the phenomenon of restriction, Paul Berg
Paul Berg speaks about Herbert Boyer's research into the process by which an organism, such as a bacterium, can recognize and destroy foreign DNA.
15649. The controversy (pros/cons)
The controversy: With recombinant DNA, scientists had the means to manipulate living things. But could there be a danger in "playing God?" While some were thrilled by the potential of these new techniques to combat genetic diseases such as cancer, others
15133. Why Asilomar conference was a bad idea, Victor McElheny
Former New York Times science journalist Victor McElheny talks about why he thought the "Moratorium Letter" was asking for trouble.
15653. Asilomar meeting
Asilomar meeting. February 1975. (L to R) Maxine Singer, Norton Zinder, Sydney Brenner, Paul Berg.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
CSHL HomeAbout CSHLResearchEducationPublic EventsNewsstandPartner With UsGiving