Website Search
ID 16981

Irreducible Complexity and Flagella - Deconstructing ID

Part 2 of a 7-part series with Dr. Eugenie C. Scott.: Debunking Intelligent Design. Dr. Scott criticizes claims by creationists that flagellated bacteria (flagellum) are an example of irreducible complexity. She concludes that examples of irreducible co
John Connolly: So what you’re getting at here is the concept of irreducible complexity, isn’t it? Eugenie Scott: That’s one of the main concepts; in fact it’s arguable the only real scientific component of intelligent design, this idea that in a structure like the bacteria flagellum, which has kind of become the poster child for intelligent design, you’ve got about 50 proteins, about 50 components of this structure, and the claim is that if you take even one of them away you don’t have a flagellum that works anymore; the motor doesn’t work, the bacterium just lies there in the water and it’s downhill from there. That’s just empirically wrong; you can take away lots of proteins and still get a functional flagellum. Number one, there’s no such thing as ‘the’ bacteria flagellum; there are lots of different flagella, and there’s bacteria flagella, there’s eukaryotic cell flagella, there’s lots of structures like flagella in nature, there’s not ‘a’ flagella and the model doesn’t really work when you look at the whole range of stuff. But in a sense the idea of irreducible complexity is kind of true by definition; if I took enough parts of you away, you’d stop working, so it’s not that it’s impossible to think of something that at some level is irreducibly complex but the problem with intelligent design is that they want to argue that there’s a whole class of phenomena in nature that we just take off the table for science to explain. Now, what scientist wants to say ‘this is unsolvable’; there [are] a lot of problems in nature, there [are] a lot of problems that scientists have that we haven’t yet explained, but not having yet explained something doesn’t make something unexplainable, and that’s the mistake that the intelligent design folks make.
creationism, intelligent design, creation science, henry morris, darwinism, evolution, darwin, Genesis, eugenie, scott, dnalc, cshl
Creative Commons License This work by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Related content:

16983. Creation Science - Challenging the Theory of Evolution
Part 4 of a 7-part series with Dr. Eugenie C. Scott: Science, Religion, and Evolutionary Theory. Dr. Scott discusses the history of creationism/intelligent design, which was revived in the United States in the 1960s. Some conservative Christians believe
16980. Intelligent Design and Creationism as Science
Part 1 of a 7-part interview with Eugenie C. Scott: Religion, Science, and Theory. Dr. Scott describes intelligent design as a fundamentally religious explanation that has no scientific basis. She discusses the difference between hypothesis and theory,
16984. McLean versus Arkansas Board of Education
Part 5 of a 7-part interview with Dr. Eugenie C. Scott: Creation Science on Trial. Dr. Scott discusses the legal challenge to the Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act introduced in Arkansas in 1981. Evidence by creation scie
16986. God and Science - Incompatible?
Part 7 of a 7-part series with Dr. Eugenie C. Scott: The Bible, the Flood, and the Grand Canyon. Dr. Scott believes that affirming science and believing in God are compatible. However, claims by creationists that the Grand Canyon was created by a flood
16985. Keeping God out of the Classroom - Creation Science and Constitution
Part 6 of a 7-part series with Dr. Eugenie C. Scott: Creation Science Brings Religion to the Classroom. Dr. Scott discusses attempts by the creationist movement to introduce religion into high school science curricula. She makes the point that because w
16982. The Eye and Irreducible Complexity - Creationism Debunked
Part 3 of a 7-part series with Dr. Eugenie C. Scott: Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and the Eye. Dr. Scott criticizes claims by proponents of creation science that the vertebrate eye is too complex a mechanism to have evolved by natural sel
16311. Biography 12: Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1892)
Charles Darwin changed the world with his theory of evolution.
16303. Gallery 12: Charles Darwin, ca 1859
Charles Darwin, around 1859.
11811. Francis Galton and Presidents of International Eugenics Congresses: Major L. Darwin, H. F. Osborn, C.B. Davenport, Eugenical News (vol. 17)
Francis Galton and Presidents of International Eugenics Congresses: Major L. Darwin, H. F. Osborn, C.B. Davenport, Eugenical News (vol. 17)
16306. Gallery 12: Charles Darwin's study (2)
Interior of Darwin's study, showing mantelpiece, corner and Darwin's chair on wheels.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
CSHL HomeAbout CSHLResearchEducationPublic EventsNewsstandPartner With UsGiving